Gambling Licence Hong Kong

Gambling Licence Hong Kong Rating: 5,0/5 7186 reviews

Hong Kong is home to only four forms of legal gambling. Mahjong is one and operates under special exemptions from our gambling laws when certain conditions are met. Horse racing is what we are most known for and is practically a religion here. The same company that facilitates horse racing bets also has the government-granted monopoly on lottery, and football betting. Their website is extremely comprehensive and available in English at www.hkjc.com/home/english. As everything you’d want to know and more about gambling in Hong Kong can be found from that site, in this article I will focus only on the laws.

  • At present, such authorized gambling outlets include horse racing organized by the Hong Kong Jockey Club, the Mark Six Lottery, authorized football betting and gaming activities authorized by the public officer appointed by the Secretary for Home Affairs under the Gambling Ordinance (Cap. Mahjong parlours).
  • The Historical Laws of Hong Kong Online is a full-text image database providing access to past revised editions of Hong Kong Laws. The database comprises a total of seven consolidations of the laws of Hong Kong: 1890, 1901, 1912, 1923, 1937, 1950, and 1964 (last updated to 1989). With the current Laws of Hong Kong available on the web, the Historical Laws of Hong Kong Online.
  • The main legislation governing gambling in Hong Kong is the Gambling Ordinance (Cap. The organiser has to obtain a licence and fulfill the conditions of the licence in conducting the game.

Gambling Laws Explained

There are two legal documents that cover the bulk of our gambling law. These are the Betting Duty Ordinance Cap.108 (first passed in 2003 and was last amended in 2006) and the Gambling Ordinance Cap.148 (first passed in 1977 and last amended in 2006). While a lot of words to read, the law is very easy to understand.

Hong Kong Jockey Club (HKJC) holds a government-granted monopoly on all gambling involving horse races, football matches, and lottery. Bets made through HKJC approved channels are legal. Mahjong is covered separately in the law and poker is a gray area (mostly considered illegal). All other forms of gambling are unlawful and carry the harsh penalties listed below.

First conviction: fine of $10000 AND up to 3-months imprisonment.

Second conviction: fine of $20000 AND up to 6-months imprisonment.

Third conviction: fine of $30000 AND up to 9-months imprisonment.

Key Facts: Online Gambling In Hong Kong. Online betting and gambling legal with licensed operators (since 2006). Football betting (soccer) is the most popular with punters. Legal gambling age is 18+. Overseas providers legal with a license (current non exist) Offshore operators continue to serve customers in the market.

It is also important to note that due to the Gambling (Amendment) Ordinance of 2002 these laws fully apply to internet and telephone betting with foreign sources. At virtually all HKJC approved betting channels reminders are plastered all over informing players they can go to prison for up to 9-months if they use foreign bookmakers.

For reason Hong Kong is a global economic power, has extradition treaties with much of the world, and has extremely harsh penalties for gambling operators found in violation of HK law, most every foreign betting site blocks Hong Kong players from making deposits. There is however some offshore gambling sites (that while illegal) Hong Kong residents can use, but these are far and few between.

Mahjong Law

Kong

To help you better understand our mahjong law I need to first mention that Hong Kong was British colony from 1842-1997. Today we are one of two special administrative regions of China (Macau is the other). We have our own currency, unique history, passports, government and laws. In short we have not been subject to gambling law of Chinese Mainland for over 170 years. Back on topic here, the Colonial Government had banned all forms of gambling under the Gambling Ordinance of 1891. Cap.40 of 1931 allowed for limited forms of gambling and its 1950 rewrite expanded this to allow for licensed Mahjong Parlours.

From 1950-1976 Colonial Europeans issued licenses to approximately 140 Mahjong clubs. In 1977 this law was repealed. While no new clubs have been licensed since, those that held a license prior to 1977 are still allowed to operate legally. There are about 60 of these clubs left. They take 7.5% commission from player’s winnings and are fully legal under Section 22 of the Gambling Ordinance.

Modern Mahjong clubs are far more popular than the licensed ones and fall under Section 3 of the Gambling Ordinance. This allows social-occasion gambling on games involving dice, dominoes, mahjong or tin kau tiles, and playing cards only in licensed restaurants, premises licensed to sell liquor and clubs (as defined by 4-2 of the Clubs Safety of Premises Ordinance). To be legal: admission must not be charged to enter the premise and there must be no exclusive bank. It also must not be a trade of the business in any way. This means no promotion of the games, no employees playing the games, and no cut taken from the winnings.

Hong Kong Poker Law

Poker is a very popular in Hong Kong, both with Chinese players and expats. Until 2010, poker clubs operated out in the open feeling they held the same legal exemption as Mahjong. A series of police raids put an end to this. The Blue House was raided and shutdown in March 2010, a high-stakes game involving a Merrill Lynch director was raided in July 2010, and the famous PokerStars co-sponsored Hong Kong Poker House in August 2010.

These raids sent poker underground. Today, it still exists but for reason being caught involves a 3-month prison sentence for a first offense it is difficult to get into the game without knowing someone. It’s worth noting gambling in Macau is a one-hour ferry ride away from Hong Kong and here poker and casino games are offered in HKD currency.

Holders of a Hong Kong Identity Card, Hong Kong Permanent Identity Card or Re-entry Permit are allowed to enter Macau without even needing a passport. Macau tourism figures show this is a popular option. In 2012, Macau’s visitor arrivals from Hong Kong were 7,081,153, which is slightly than the total population of Hong Kong. This is because each visit is counted separate, and for some serious gamblers Macau is an every weekend trip.

An extract from The Gambling Law Review, 5th Edition

Overview

In Hong Kong, the most common types of lawful gambling available to the general public are lotteries, horse racing and football betting. They are run by the Hong Kong Jockey Club, which is the only racing club and legal bookmaker in the territory, and so has a monopoly. Casino gambling in a land-based casino is not legal in Hong Kong. Macao, a major gaming city, is just about an hour away by road or ferry.

The position on online gambling is less certain, given that the main statute that regulates gambling looks at gambling in the traditional way where people have to be physically present in the same place to deal with each other. However, betting with illegal bookmakers, whether through the telephone, internet or otherwise, is specifically prohibited.

Gambling is not against Hong Kong's public policy, so any gaming credit granted in another jurisdiction or loan given for the purpose of gambling may be enforced through the Hong Kong courts as long as they are legal under the applicable governing law. This is in contrast with the situation in mainland China where lawsuits related to gaming credit or gambling will not be accepted. Hong Kong thus provides a useful forum for the collection of gaming credit obtained by mainland Chinese punters who have assets in Hong Kong.

Even though casinos do not legally exist in Hong Kong, marketing activities for gaming are not prohibited. Many large casino groups have marketing offices in Hong Kong to promote their products and services to high-rollers in the region. Hong Kong is also a strategic location for such activities in view of its proximity to Macao and mainland China. Gambling in general and gambling-related marketing activities remain unlawful in mainland China, notwithstanding most of the revenues to the major gaming hubs in Asia and beyond are contributed by punters from mainland China.

Legal and regulatory framework

The main legislation governing gambling in Hong Kong is the Gambling Ordinance (Cap. 148). The general position is that gambling is unlawful unless the act falls within one of the exemptions under the statute. The definitions of various key terms are laid out under Section 2. Gambling is defined to include 'gaming', 'betting' and 'bookmaking.' Historically, the law is targeted towards gambling at unlicensed establishments and betting with illegal bookmakers. Private bets, gaming carried out in private premises on social occasions and certain types of games carried out in licensed premises on social and non-social occasions are not unlawful under the Gambling Ordinance.

i Gaming

A 'game', which is one form of gambling, is widely defined to include 'a game of chance, a game of chance and skill combined and a pretended game of chance or chance and skill combined' and 'gaming' is defined to mean 'the playing of or at any game for winnings in money or other property whether or not any person playing the game is at risk of losing any money or other property'. Under these wide definitions, whatever activities where an element of chance is involved and the participants stand to win something will be a form of gambling, and will, therefore, be unlawful. One classic example of a game is a lucky draw, which is also a lottery. To lawfully conduct the game, the organiser has to obtain a licence and fulfill the conditions of the licence in conducting the game.

By the same token, a game played on an online gambling platform or virtual casino, which offers the players a chance to win money or other property falls within the definition of a game. However, a person who takes part in online gambling will usually do it at home in front of his or her computer, so the person cannot be charged with the offence of gambling in a gambling establishment under Section 6 of the Gambling Ordinance, where 'gambling establishment' is defined to include 'any premises or place, whether or not the public or a Section of the public is entitled or permitted to have access thereto, opened, kept or used, whether on one occasion or more than one occasion, for the purposes of or in connexion with unlawful gambling or an unlawful lottery'. Although Section 13 makes it an offence for someone to gamble in a place that is not a gambling establishment, one crucial element is that the place where the gambling takes place must be the place where the other person operates or manages or otherwise controls the unlawful gambling. In the case of online gambling, the physical location where the online gaming operator controls the gambling, usually in a jurisdiction where such operations are legal, will not be the same place as where the punter gambles. Theoretically speaking, both the operator and the punter can be in the same physical location in Hong Kong when the online gambling takes place, but it is only in this unlikely and narrow scenario that the statute can be applied against them.

For these reasons, there seems to be a loophole in the current legislative framework as regards online gambling (as opposed to betting, which is specifically regulated under the same statute), as historically the law was drafted to regulate traditional gambling activities where people have to be in front of each other in a physical location. Although one cannot safely assume playing poker or a casino-style game online at home, where real money is at stake, is immune from prosecution, it is at least questionable which specific offence is committed under the Gambling Ordinance in that situation.

In recent years, whether or not electronic sports is a form of gambling has become a hot topic. As the definition of a 'game' is 'a game of chance, a game of chance and skill combined', the sport concerned will not be a game if the playing of which is purely based on the player's skill and not chance and skill combined. For instance, a ping-pong game played on a ping-pong table is not a game because its outcome is solely based on the skill of the players, notwithstanding sometimes sports players will attribute the outcome of a match to their 'luck'. This is in contrast with someone's luck in a lucky draw where the participants have no control in the results at all.

ii Betting and bookmaking

The legal position on betting is much clearer. The Gambling Ordinance under Section 8 specifically prohibits betting with a bookmaker, whether or not the bet is received within or outside Hong Kong. Unauthorised bookmaking is also a crime in Hong Kong, but the law specifically provides that betting with a bookmaker authorised under the Betting Duties Ordinance (Chapter 108), (i.e., the Hong Kong Jockey Club) is lawful. As such, the only way to lawfully bet with a bookmaker in Hong Kong is to patronise the Hong Kong Jockey Club.

Betting with overseas bookmakers, even if they are legal in the jurisdiction where they operate, is an offence regardless of how the bet is placed. In practice, however, it is difficult to see how law enforcement can meaningfully crack down on this type of illegal betting given the ease of making a phone call and gaining access to the internet. The law seems to be more effective in deterring overseas bookmakers from soliciting business in Hong Kong, as most prominent bookmakers will deny access to their platforms if they detect that the users are accessing their webpage from Hong Kong.

iii Wager

Gaming License Hong Kong

A 'bet' can also be made between persons where none of them is a bookmaker, which is not prohibited by the Gambling Ordinance. This type of bet is more formally known as a 'wager'.

'Wager' is not defined in the Gambling Ordinance. As a common law jurisdiction and a former British colony, Hong Kong benefits from a rich body of case law applicable to gaming contracts and their enforcement. Traditionally, the courts had been asked to determine disputes relating to a 'wagering contract,' which is not defined in any statue. The term 'wagering' has been described judicially in Carlill v. Carbolic Smoke Ball Co [1892] 2 QB 484 as:

Gambling Licence Hong Kong Hong Kong

A wagering contract is one by which two persons professing to hold opposite views touching the issue of a future uncertain event, mutually agree that, dependent upon the determination of that event, one shall win from the other, and that other shall pay or hand over to him, a sum of money or other stake; neither of the contracting parties having any interest in that contract than the sum or stake he will so win or lose, there being no other real consideration for the making of such contract by either of the parties.

This judicial description of wager, or bet, should not be treated in the same way as a statutory definition. It is possible that the meaning of the word will be reinterpreted or redefined in other cases. While this judicial definition of a wager is limited to a contract between two persons, the position in Hong Kong is that a bet made between two or more persons is lawful provided that none of the parties to the contract is a bookmaker or does it as a trade or business. As such, where there are more than two persons participating with their stakes forming a common fund to be paid over to the winner, such multipartite arrangement is lawful if none of the parties is a bookmaker.

At common law, betting is not illegal and a wagering contract is enforceable provided that it does not incite a breach of the peace and is not immoral or otherwise contrary to public policy. This is in contrast with some jurisdictions where a wagering contract is made unenforceable by statute.

iv Contract for difference

Gambling Licence Hong Kong Official

A 'contract for difference' is defined in the Gambling Ordinance to mean 'an agreement the purpose or effect of which is to obtain a profit or avoid a loss by reference to fluctuations in the value or price of property of any description or in an index or other factor designated for that purpose in the agreement'. The Gambling Ordinance does not apply to any contracts for differences that are listed on any specified stock exchange or traded in any specified futures exchange.